- Rate your efficiency and agility in transferring the required data to Ellipse with the former drop down pick list style work order form. (10=Excellent, 1=Poor)
- 8
- 5
- 6
- 10
- 10
- 9
- 4
- 7
- 3
- Rate your efficiency and agility in transferring the required data to Ellipse withthe Mesh RCM tree view failure mode selection method. (10=Excellent, 1=Poor)
- 10
- 9
- 8
- 10
- 10
- 6
- 8
- 8
- 8
- Do you consider that the RCM knowledge feedback function helps to improve the RCM knowledge base? (10=Immense help, 1=no help)
- 10
- 8
- 6
- 10
- 10
- 8
- 7
- 9
- 8
- How much value does the image gallery for a failure mode add ? (10=Immense value, 1=no value)
- 10
- 10
- 10
- 5
- 6
- How much value does the failure mode count visible in the RCM analysis tree view add to your understanding of the equipment’s reliability ? (10=Immense value, 1=no value)
- 10
- 8
- 10
- 10
- 10
- 6
- 9
- 8
- How well trained to you feel in the use of the LRCM Mesh tools? (10=Highly trained, 1=poorly trained)
- 10
- 8
- 7
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 8
- 10
- 7
- List the advantages of the Mesh tools.
- More failure modes are identified, and identified correctly. It identifies the number of times a failure mode occurs, and specifically within which systems. It enables us to suggest preventive maintenance actions when failure modes are identified and selected. It helps to bring the PM control closer to day-to-day observation.
- It is faster
- We can consider alternative preventive actions with regard to a failure mode.
- It’s very fast
- With the latest systems improvement Mesh is more responsive and secure. Takes 5 seconds.
- It helps recognize specific equipment with particular failures.
- It helps the analysts make recommendations for improvement.
- It is quick
- Fast and versatile
- List the main weaknesses of the Mesh tools.
- In some systems the current analysis is too general.
- At this time I see none.
- I do not see weaknesses.
- We need to include maintenance areas other than just the downtime activities. Include also the PM work orders and rebuild shops. Supervisors, schedulers, and coordinators should use Mesh so as to be be more involved in the work orders they open.
- We need more precision from the operator who should also be involved in the review and update of the knowledge base.
- Slowness
- What improvements would you like to see in the Mesh tools?
- Add more failures to the RCM analysis. Sometimes there is insufficient detail. E.g. “Engine speed alarm, RPM X not attained.”
- Refresh training.
- It should be faster and more reliable.
- Nothing. All OK
- When the technician makes a selection, the icon in the tree should change color to avoid confusion. The name of the technician should be visible in the feedback form. The remaining useful life estimates should be shown on the tree. The work order should change color when filled out.
## Post Tree Navigation
LRCM
- CMMS Impediments to Reliability Analysis
- Components of continuous improvement
- How to start LRCM
- Justifying Living RCM Certified
- Leading and lagging performance numbers
- Living RCM Certified – Consulting Services
- LRCM – Reporting failure modes of rotable components
- LRCM and HSE
- LRCM Justification Template
- LRCM reliability analyst survey results
- LRCM reliability technician survey results
- MESH – RCM knowledge continuous improvement
- Motivation, leadership, training
- PAS-55
- RCM – Dashboards
- Reliability engineer’s work cycle
- Service vs. maintenance
- Streamlined RCM and LRCM
- Structured free text
- The role of media in living RCM
- The winning paper at the XIV International Congress of Maintenance
- Two philosophies in maintenance improvement
- Waiting for CMMS maturity
- What is a pilot project?
- What is the difference between RCM and LRCM?
- Achieving Reliability from Data outline with video
- Course brochure – Living RCM Certified
- Deepwater Horizon
- Elevator description of LRCM
- How does LRCM “improve” RCM?
- Living RCM Certified
- Living RCM Certified eLearning
- Living RCM Certified® and ISO 14224
- LRCM – off the maintenance improvement radar
- LRCM-EXAKT – a general solution
- MESH Basic reliability analysis on the work order
- Mesh Living RCM Certified brochure – Mesh Cloud Service
- Obtener confiabilidad a partir de los datos – esquema del curso
- RCM – Analyst course outline
- RCM – feedback suggestion mechanism
- RCM – Living RCM
- RCM – LRCM dashboards
- RCM – feedback – suggesting a new failure mode
- Training course in achieving reliability from data
- Two kinds of decision making in maintenance
- Two LRCM purposes
- Videos
- Why Living RCM works
RCM
Reliability Analysis
- Achieving Reliability from Data
- Challenges to Achieving Reliability from Data
- Data analysis precedes reliability analysis
- Data is the key to the way forward
- Defeating CBM
- Does historical age data have value?
- Failure declaration standards
- Free text on the work order
- How much data is required for RA?
- How to assess EAM and CBM predictive capability
- Interpreting failure data
- LRCM – Reporting failure modes of rotable components
- Maintenance software
- Mesh: 12 steps to achieving reliability from data
- RA requires LRCM
- Reliability analysis in 2 dimensions-Part 2
- Sample selection
- So you’re getting an EAM
- Take the EAM data health check
- The CMMS barrier to RCM
- The data barrier to analysis
- The reliability data Catch 22
- Thoughts from a mine maintenance engineer
- Variations in a sample
- Warranty for haul trucks
- Weibull exercises
- What’s the right data?
- A survey of signal processing and decision technologies for CBM
- Achieving reliability from data
- CBM Defined
- Conditional failure probability, reliability, and failure rate
- Conditional probability of failure
- Conditional probability of failure vs. hazard rate
- Criticality analysis in RCM
- Diagnostics versus prognostics
- Difference between LRCM and EXAKT
- EXAKT’s Three Modules
- Expected failure time for an item whose maintenance policy is time-based
- Failure analysis for reliability analysis
- Failure probability prior to attaining MTTF
- FAQ
- FMEA according to Wikipedia
- Is “random failure” really random?
- Leading and lagging performance numbers
- LRCM and the Failure Finding Interval
- MTTF is the area under the reliability curve
- Myths about RCM in heavy mining equipment
- Non-rejuvenating events
- Optimal PM and spares strategies – exercises
- Performance metrics – Low and High level KPIs
- Problem statement
- Purpose of RA
- RA – Micro (day-to-day decision) analysis
- Random failure and the MTTF
- Random failure is exponential reliability decay
- RCM – Living RCM: Achieving reliability from data
- RCM vs RA
- Real meaning of the six RCM curves
- Reliability analysis is counting
- Reliability trend yes Weibull analysis no
- Remaining Useful Life Estimation Using Hybrid Monte-Carlo Simulation and Proportional Hazard Model
- Safety Instrumented Systems
- TBM or CBM?
- Terminology in LRCM
- Thinking RCM
- Time to failure
- What is PM?
- What is the scale parameter?
CBM
- A survey of signal processing and decision technologies for CBM
- Automating CBM
- Building a CBM decision model
- CBM Exercises
- CBM Optimization
- Combined analysis for early predictive maintenance
- Deploying the CBM model
- EXAKT cost sensitivity analysis
- EXAKT needs LRCM
- EXAKT vs Weibull
- Measuring and Improving CBM Effectiveness
- Optimizing a Condition Based Maintenance Program with Gearbox Tooth Failure
- RCM – Reliability analysis in more than two dimensions is CBM
- Smart CBM demo
- What is Maintenance Decision Automation?
- Confidence in predictive maintenance
- Diagnostics versus prognostics
- Inspections – CBM and others
- Inspections or CBM?
- Internal and external CBM variables
- NAVAIR and the PF interval
- Objectivity in condition based maintenance decisions
- Optimized interpretation of CBM data
- P-F Interval a red herring?
- PF interval from the failure rate
- PM, PdM, Proactive Maintenance
- Predictive analytics
- Temporary fix work orders
- The elusive P-F interval
These are the results of a survey of a group of 9 technicians tasked to interact with the new Mesh work order closure form. This alternative entry method, a feature of “Living RCM” is meant to improve data quality for eventual reliability analysis. Mesh LRCM has two principal objectives. First, to ensure analyzable work order data, and second, to update the RCM knowledge base whenever it deviates from reality as observed by the technician. On a scale of 1 to 10, 8 maintenance technicians with the responsibility to convey the work order data from technicians in the field to the EAM, rated LRCM against traditional EAM work order procedures.
If you liked this article you may also enjoy
- How to assess EAM and CBM predictive capability (90.8%)
- Failure declaration standards (60.6%)
- Defeating CBM (60.6%)
- The reliability data Catch 22 (60.6%)
- LRCM – Work order entry (39.4%)
- Course brochure – Living RCM Certified (RANDOM – 9.2%)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.